Abstract
Background and Purpose
To develop and test a decision tree for predicting contrast enhancement quality and shape using precontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences in a large adult-type diffuse glioma cohort.
Methods
Preoperative MRI scans (development/optimization/test sets: n = 31/38/303, male = 17/22/189, mean age = 52/59/56.7 years, high-grade glioma = 22/33/249) were retrospectively evaluated, including pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and diffusion-weighted imaging sequences. Enhancement prediction decision tree (EPDT) was developed using development and optimization sets, incorporating four imaging features: necrosis, diffusion restriction, T2 inhomogeneity, and nonenhancing tumor margins. EPDT accuracy was assessed on a test set by three raters of variable experience. True enhancement features (gold standard) were evaluated using pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted images. Statistical analysis used confusion matrices, Cohen’s/Fleiss’ kappa, and Kendall’s W. Significance threshold was p < .05.
Results
Raters 1, 2, and 3 achieved overall accuracies of .86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .81-.90), .89 (95% CI: .85-.92), and .92 (95% CI: .89-.95), respectively, in predicting enhancement quality (marked, mild, or no enhancement). Regarding shape, defined as the thickness of enhancing margin (solid, rim, or no enhancement), accuracies were .84 (95% CI: .79-.88), .88 (95% CI: .84-.92), and .89 (95% CI: .85-.92). Intrarater intergroup agreement comparing predicted and true enhancement features consistently reached substantial levels (≥.68 [95% CI: .61-.75]). Interrater comparison showed at least moderate agreement (group: ≥.42 [95% CI: .36-.48], pairwise: ≥.61 [95% CI: .50-.72]). Among the imaging features in the EPDT, necrosis assessment displayed the highest intra- and interrater consistency (≥.80 [95% CI: .73-.88]).
Conclusion
The proposed EPDT has high accuracy in predicting enhancement patterns of gliomas irrespective of rater experience.
If you do not see content above, kindly GO TO SOURCE.
Not all publishers encode content in a way that enables republishing at Neuro.vip.
This post is Copyright: Aynur Azizova,
Ivar J. H. G. Wamelink,
Yeva Prysiazhniuk,
Marcus Cakmak,
Elif Kaya,
Jan Petr,
Frederik Barkhof,
Vera C. Keil | September 20, 2024
Wiley: Journal of Neuroimaging: Table of Contents